Paul Harte Professional Corporation | Barristers & Solicitors    

Profile

Paul Harte

Fees

Contact

Links

 

FAQ

Medical Mistakes

Choosing a Lawyer

Case Evaluation

Medical Records

CMPA

 

Birth Injuries

Gynecology

Medication Error

 
 
 

Contact Us

(888) 441-3341

 

 

Medical Records

Our work inevitably leads us to the medical records. In fact, reviewing medical records is often the first and most important step in every type of investigation or assessment we undertake.

What are Medical Records

A patient record is a history of the management of their care. It details what was done and not done in treating the patient. The extent and nature of the record for any given patient will vary according to the complexity of the problems and the amount of information that has previously been recorded. All of the information in the record is invaluable to the patient's ongoing care. It is also invaluable in investigating the quality of care that was provided.

Clinical records are created to enable the health professional to adequately manage the care of their patients. Medical records provide and preserve information relating to the treatment, diagnosis and communications between a doctor (or other medical professional) and his patient. 

The record will usually include, among other things, a family and personal medical history, the results of any physical examinations, reports of other consulting physicians, emergency reports, and progress notes. The record will also include the results of any tests or investigations undertaken on behalf of the patient.

Importance of Records to your Case

Physicians generally see many hundreds of patients in a year. It would be unreasonable to expect that they would recall much of any particular patient visit. As a result, medical records are critical in assisting the physician to recall what was said, done or recommended at any specific visit. When records are incomplete or sketchy, this generally works against the physician.

The patient, on the other hand, typically has a good recollection of visits. For them, the visit represents an infrequent and generally important event in their lives. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, usually found in the medical records, the patient’s recollection is most often preferred to that of the doctors.

Good Charting

Accurate, detailed and complete records are indicative of a thoughtful and diligent physician. Conversely sparse, illegible records suggest a physician who has spent little time in assessing and thoughtfully approaching a patient’s medical problem. 

Accessing Records

The Supreme Court of Canada set out the common law right of the patient to access medical records of his doctor in the the case of McInerney v. MacDonald, [1992] 2 S.C.R. 138. In the absence of legislation, patients are entitled, upon request, to examine and copy all information in their medical records which the treating physician considered in administering advice or treatment, including records prepared by other doctors that the physician may have received. The patient is not entitled to the records themselves; the physical medical records of the patient belong to the physician.

Access is also a fundamental principle of the federal Personal Information and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) - individuals have the right to request and see any personal information physicians hold about them. There are remedies under this Act for the failure to provide access to a patient's own records.

Physicians and hospitals generally must provide a copy of a patient's clinical chart upon request by a patient or other authorized individual (e.g. a lawyer). They are permitted to request a written authorization and generally charge for making the copies.

The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario requires that all physicians must allow for access to and correction of records. A failure to provide access will usually result in disciplinary proceedings. A complaint can be made to the College if access to records are not complied with in a timely manner. Before lodging a complaint, the patient should advise the doctor of their intention to complain and provide the doctor an opportunity to respond.
 
If a complaint is necessary, it must be made in writing identifying the physician and setting out the circumstances of the complaint. It should be directed to:
Director, Public Complaints
The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario
80 College Street
Toronto, Ontario
M5G 2E2

Charges for Records

There are no specific regulations dealing with the charges that a doctor or physician may levy for copying the record. The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario permits a "reasonable fee" for copying records. However, a physician or hospital should not charge the patient a fee which exceeds the cost of the materials used, the time required to prepare the material, and the direct cost of providing the material to the patient.

A physician may not require prepayment of fees for providing records and non-payment of the fee is not a reason to withhold the information. Hospitals can and usually do require prepayment of their fee before releasing the records.

The Medico-Legal Society of Toronto suggests that a reasonable fee for photocopying of medical records is $50 for the first ten pages, and 25 cents per page thereafter.

Generally, one can expect to pay between $25.00 and up, from a physician and $100.00 and up from a hospital, depending on the volume of material and the age of the records. A long hospital stay, might result in a charge of several hundred dollars.

Retention of Records

In Ontario doctor's records must be kept for the greater of 10 years or 10 years after the patient turns 18 years old (regulations under the Medicine Act). Hospital records must be kept for the greater of 10 years from the date of the last visit or 10 years after the patient turns 18 years old (regulations under the Public Hospitals Act).

Last modified 10/10/07

 

  

Contact Us

  •  

Your Privacy

  •  

Disclaimer

© 1995-2007 Paul Harte Professional Corporation. All rights reserved.